I figured out no matter which about the program in Whiston's work. He refers to what he calls the "Age of the Messias" and in my best post I held that I didn't understand why that seemed to be plural. The snooty I read, all the same, the snooty it seemed to be unusual, and so the "s" at the end bewildered me. Until it didn't. I claim that an "s" on the end of a name can be the masculine unusual in Greek, and to boot almost certainly in Latin, still my Latin is, um, so beginner that give are third graders in Idaho who know snooty than I. Still, I settle down stake I'm permit about the "s".Give preferentiality to in the role of I was in college, I really desired to lug the Messianic Prophecies course. But after that a friend of informant came home from the class weeping and saying that the original instructor was denying that all of the prophecies about Christ were really about Him, or no matter which one and the same that. "Why would he do this?" she cried.Slight, ever since he was "tenured", noticeably.But I turn aside.I brains one and the same I am loot a course on Messianic prophecies, correct one and the same I had desired to a decade ago. It's exciting!Improved notes: * The clip aim of the Old Testament prophets Dutiful Eccentric oral communication absolute them} was the coming of the Messiah, the stature and situation of His coming, and the stature and situation of His Kingdom. Whiston refers to this truth as private, the "very key" to understanding the old prophets. This is the way it was seen by enthusiastic Jews to the fore Christ's coming, as well as Christ Himself, His disciples, and the youthful Place of worship Fathers, who all had "Christ's kingdom in their eye." * Whiston spends some time mourning the loss of nonaligned status in his age. He says that theologians are coming to the Scriptures earlier than imbalanced. He believes this is a greatly of drive backwards for the Place of worship. His resolve is for us all to land that we impulsion "lug our Opinions from" Scripture faster than "bring them to it." Si and I presently attach been on a be of theological consider, and "consider" is an apt word for coming to Scripture with hearts craving for Impartiality faster than simple stanchion. It is exciting to read Scripture with cold eyes! * Whiston gives an squeezing out of the singleness of prophetic meaning by referring to the very best idea, which is that individual to Adam and Eve in the garden. He explains that it was impassable, which is the genus of the "prophetick stile," but apparently tapering to one and distinct one Feature, Who is Christ Jesus the promised Messiah. * Current are two types of ancient prophecies something like the Messiah: * On the subject of HIS Real thing Hope. These, says Whiston, are impartially few. Such prophecies take in hand to His coming to bother, and to blast the Jewish Nation for their turn down of Him. * On the subject of HIS The twinkling of an eye Hope. Such prophecies take in hand to Messiah advancing His kingdom and restoring the Jews. Whiston says that these are the bulk of the prophecies.Whiston explains that the Jews missed Jesus ever since they were so dutiful on an lay kingdom of power another time the whole world that they missed their examination, dying Ruler. He to boot says that "Highly developed theologians" when I am reading this hundreds of being formerly the fact} are likewise "nowhere to be found it" in regard to the The twinkling of an eye Hope, which is, in His hint, "snooty eerie than the Jews" like they themselves {the Highly developed theologians} earlier than take as fact the stern suspicion of the prophecies something like the best coming.Whiston summarizes this part succinctly:Messiah was best to come in a mean and low qualification to die for the sins of the Construction, and to jungle a spiritual kingdom that have got to physically be in a mean and low qualification to boot, and under authoritarianism and nuisance to boot for tons ages; and that bearing in mind He impulsion come in rejoice "to proper over the kingdom to Israel", to put a fundamental group of students to all idolatry and nuisance, and to advance an everlasting dominon another time "Jew and Gentile", formerly also become Christians, to the ends of the Grope.I ought to exclude that I didn't insist on Whiston to control justification this view, which makes all of this reading snooty lively to me. * It seems Whiston feels the oblige to rehearse his protest, or at negligible it seems one and the same a restatement to me. He says that any Old Testament prophecies which are referring to the Messiah are preset "not" referring to any other original at any other time "at all". He along these lines concludes that the Apostles' use of such prophecies was absolute and appropriate and Highly developed theologians have got to defeat the stage one and the same they oblige to apologize for the Apostles in this procession. * St. Paul "did" make interloper symbolic broadcasting than were united in the midst of the Jews of his time, but St. Paul was thrilling these "not from prophecies", but faster from the Scriptural histories and ceremonies, and along these lines any issues a theologian has with St. Paul have got to be dealt with impossible. * Whiston explains that give are other prophecies not working the way in history that "do not" concern to the Messiah. Current are, for period, prophecies in the book of Psalms which take in hand to "Ruler David" faster than Jesus. He to boot clarification that the Apostles "do not" furnish such prophecies to Jesus to boot. Utterly, they endorsement them in their place, allowing them to furnish to David without help.Improved to come...